Drop in and dribble on about nothing serious. Seriously a mad place to hang out. Better to avoid it if you're not in the mood!!! If you're determined to be sad, bad, mad & angry then move along!!!
WHAT A SURPRISE!! Trump has contradicted himself again...
Act 1: He has refused to sign on to the Christchurch Call (to block live streaming of violence on social media)...
He objects to the curtailing of free speech.
Act 2: He has ordered an extradition request to the UK Govt to bring Julian Assange before US courts for exercising free speech by publishing US secret documents he was given!
Ummmmm.
Something not quite right here...
Regards & God bless,
Ray
-- "Insufficient data for a meaningful answer." Isaac Asimov, "The Last Question"
"I refuse to drink water, because of the disgusting things fish do in it" W.C.Fields
There is a difference between the two if you were to take it seriously.
1. Was to keep the violence of anti moslem paybacks for their anti kaffir activities from being hidden.
2. Divulging a countries secret/s is just short of treason.
So there is a difference if you were to look at it.
Ron
Much that passes as idealism is disguised hatred or disguised love of power.
Ignorance is Liberating
You're not restricted by facts or knowledge.
You're a Free Person and, as such, able to form your own conclusions.
What you really have to worry about is the figurehead of seriously strong military force with an economy to support a war for a while, doing his public speaking via Twitter.
The next thing to worry about is the same person who ran his business the way he is running a country went bankrupt 3 times, yet still got elected to run as the head of their political and financial planning system.
I'm not sure if Trump is the problem or if it is the collective intelligence of the people who voted for him to take the job?
A person may fail many times, they only become a failure when they blame someone else John Burrows
If we have data, let’s look at data. If all we have are opinions, let’s go with mine. – Jim Barksdale, former Netscape CEO
Well, it seems to be the collective intelligence of approx 25 to 30% of the population only.
Not only did just under half the population not bother to vote, (Which speaks volumes in itself I guess) but the majority of those that did bother to vote, voted for the other guy, or woman in this case.
It was this strange and wonderful thing called the electoral collage that over ruled their vote and put the loser in the whitehouse.
There Comes a time in life, when you must walk away from all drama and the people who create it
